As expected, the Board of Supervisors voted this week to place a measure on the November ballot that would give the board authority to remove a publicly elected sheriff from office for cause.
The board made the move on a 4-1 vote, with Supervisor Kathryn Barger dissenting.
If approved by voters on Nov. 8, the measure would give the board the power to remove a sheriff “for cause” on a four-fifths vote of the five-member panel.
“Cause” is defined as “a violation of any law related to the performance of their duties as sheriff; flagrant or repeated neglect of duties; a misappropriation of public funds or property; willful falsification of a relevant official statement or document; or obstruction of any investigation into the conduct of the sheriff by the Inspector General, Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission, or any government agency with jurisdiction to conduct such an investigation.”
Although board members supporting the measure denied it was political in nature, the move is a clear response to repeated clashes with current Sheriff Alex Villanueva. Villanueva has accused board members of defunding his agency at the expense of public safety, and he has also rebuffed subpoenas to appear before the county’s Civilian Oversight Commission.
Board Chair Holly Mitchell and Supervisor Hilda Solis introduced the motion calling for the ballot measure. Mitchell said during a July 12 meeting that the issue goes beyond Villanueva.
“The issue of sheriff accountability before us is both urgent and systemic, having impacted past generations of Angelenos, but also with important consequences for the future,” Mitchell said. “Unfortunately, the county has had a long and troubling history with sheriff oversight and transparency.”
The motion by Mitchell and Solis referred to previous sheriffs Lee Baca, who was sentenced to federal prison on corruption charges, and Peter Pitchess, who “resisted any involvement in the first internal investigation of deputy gangs from outside the department.”
Villanueva has blasted the proposal as unconstitutional. He sent a letter to the board last month saying the measure “would allow corrupt board members to intimidate sheriffs from carrying out their official duties to investigate crime.”
“This motion is a recipe for public corruption, particularly when ‘cause’ remains so broad and undefined,” the sheriff wrote. “Allowing political appointees with an agenda to determine ‘cause’ is fundamentally flawed. It appears you are making yourselves the judge, jury and executioner for the office of the sheriff, nullifying the will of the voters.”