How AB 53 got chewed up in the state Assembly

Email Print Twitter Facebook MySpace Stumble Digg More Destinations
Stanley O. Williford  |   OW Editor

Bill would aid women, minority, disabled veterans businesses

If you want to see how quickly a bill in Sacramento can change, submit one to the California Assembly, stand back and see what happens.

Consider the case of Assembly Bill 53, a measure that could benefit minorities, disabled veterans and women.

You’d think piranha has gotten hold of the bill.

Introduced in December by Assemblyman Jose Solorio (D-69th District), AB 53 is aimed at creating transparency by requiring the largest insurance companies doing business in the state to annually report on how much they contract with diverse, women and disabled veteran-owned businesses.

The measure had broad support from the California Department of Insurance, California National Organization for Women, Consumer Federation of California, and dozens of diverse business and community organizations. But it obviously needed more.

AB 53 was designed to impact companies with gross revenues of more than $25 million, requiring them to submit a plan annually for increasing contracts to women, minority and disabled veterans businesses.

But what came of the bill after the insurance companies got wind of it is not pretty. It changed—drastically—chewed almost to shreds. In fact, with the enforcement measures taken from it, the Greenlining Institute, one of its sponsors, withdrew support to assess whether its coalition wanted to continue with it.

That’s what happens when minorities, women and disabled veterans don’t put enough activity behind a good measure that is opposed by a well-heeled, well-oiled industry lobby. They lose out.

“The industry has beaten it so much that it will not be considered this legislative session,” said Samuel Kang, general counsel for the Greenlining Institute. “It’s mostly due to the insurance company resistance to efforts for transparency. One of the primary tactics was to take as many enforcement characteristics out of the bill as they could.

“Because the industry was pressuring the Legislature to take out enforcement measures, it was too much pressure to continue to pursue the bill this legislative session,” Kang added. “It was made into a two-year bill [rather than an annual one]. The full consideration of the bill will be delayed until the next Legislative session. So the immediate consequence is that it will be considered in 2012.”

However, Kang notes that the bill is not guaranteed to be taken up in the next session unless the business owners demand that it be.

What that requires is for ethnic and diverse business owners and women-owned businesses to contact their representatives in Sacramento, as well as the insurance commissioner to tell them that increased transparency and accessibility to the big insurance companies is needed, he said.

Nicole Mahrt, a spokeswoman for the Association of California Insurance Companies (ACIC), explained that “many insurers are national companies and don’t just operate in California or one state, so when they procure something it’s done through their corporate offices on a national basis.

Many of our companies work in coalitions that try to encourage the use of women-owned and veteran vendors. We don’t fit in that one-state-type model.”

To do a procurement program on a state-by-state basis would be too costly and inefficient, she said, but explained: “We would be happy to report the procurement programs that we are doing a national basis.”

But Kang maintains that insurance companies grab $130 billion in premiums from the state annually, and much of those premiums get funneled to Zurich and other corporate offices abroad.
If that is true, it would be nice to keep a few billion in the state.

“What AB-53 would have done would have made the big insurance companies report how much could have stayed in the state,” Kang said. “Considering that our budget deficit is around $10 billion, when you’re talking about a $130 billion industry, you can see the impact.”

A statement issued by the Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones’ office, said: “Commissioner Jones is strongly supportive of the intent of AB 53 because, very importantly, it aims to increase procurement from women, minority, and disabled veteran business enterprises. However, he has expressed some concerns about the cost burden that would be placed on the Department of Insurance to implement the provisions of the bill.

“That being said, the commissioner has conveyed these concerns to the bill’s author and they are working toward resolving these issues, including … the last set of amendments taken to the bill.”
Mahrt said the ACIC was planning to work with Solorio “to explain what we are doing.”

Those who would back AB 53 are urged to contact Assemblyman Solorio’s Sacramento office at (916) 319-2069 or his district office at (714) 939-8469. Letters should be written to: Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones, California Department of Insurance, Consumer Services Division, 300 S. Spring St., South Tower, Los Angeles, CA 90013.

Related Articles

  • Three bills crucial to communities of color await Brown’s signature -

    SACRAMENTO—Three bills considered critical to the future of California’s growing communities of color have passed the state Legislature and are now awaiting the governor’s signature.

    “Taken together, these three bills represent tremendous potential progress for California’s communities of color,” said Greenlining Institute Executive Director Orson Aguilar.

    The bills are:

  • Women: power of purchasing -

    Depending on the day, what you’re reading or who you’re listening to, the economy is either still in the tank, in recovery, getting worse or is on the upswing. Whatever the fluctuating state of the American economy, money is being spent. And, guess what, ladies? The economic oil that keeps the wheels and workings of our world turning is largely controlled by us.

    Want to know just how much purchasing power we pack in our purses? Any guesses?

  • The colors of immigration reform -

    After years of non-action and adverse action from differing political groups, persuasions and governmental entities, the issue of immigration almost immediately gained more serious national attention following the re-election of President Barack Obama.

    While most people think primarily of Hispanics and Asians when the topic of immigration comes up, there are number of people of African descent that fall into the immigrant population as well.

  • More women are choosing double mastectomies -

    Ten months ago, Vanessa Thiemann lay in bed unable to sleep.

    The 42-year-old single mother of two had a sinus infection, and the pain was making her restless. She tried getting comfortable on her left side, then her right, but she ended up staring at the ceiling in complete darkness, her left hand coming to rest on her chest.

    It was at that moment her fingers brushed a tiny knob under her skin.

    “I felt a rock-hard lump next to my nipple,” Thiemann recalls. “I just knew at that moment I had cancer.”

  • Greenlining Institute analyzes proposal -

    Gov. Brown’s proposed budget could help move California toward greater equity and fairness for the communities of color that make up the state’s majority, but serious questions remain, reports a just-released Greenlining Institute analysis presented at a state capitol briefing recently.

  • Across Black America

    Here’s a look at African American people and issues making headlines throughout the country.
     

    Alabama
    Freeman A. Hrabowski, president of the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, will address the annual African American Business Council luncheon on June 28. Hrabowski, who is chairman of President Barack Obama’s Advisory Commission on Education Excellence for African Americans, has a national reputation for his work studying the performance of minority students in math and science. Hrabowski, named one of the 10 best college presidents in the country by Time magazine, was a child leader in the Civil Rights Movement in Birmingham in the 1960s.
     

    Arkansas
    The Liberty Counsel filed a motion and a brief in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas seeking to intervene on behalf of a Concepts of Life crisis pregnancy center to defend against a suit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Reproductive Rights. The groups seek to impose a permanent injunction before the Human Heartbeat Protection Act goes into effect July 18. Liberty Counsel also filed a brief opposing the ACLU’s request for an injunction. The “Heartbeat” bill states that when a woman seeks an abortion at or after the 12th week, doctors must test for a fetal heartbeat before an abortion is performed and inform the pregnant mother that the child in her womb has a heartbeat. If a heartbeat is detected, a woman cannot have an abortion, except in cases of rape, incest, and if a mother’s life is in danger. “As we promised when the legislation was introduced, Liberty Counsel will defend this law without reservation for the people of Arkansas, born and pre-born,” said Matt Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel. “No right is more foundational than the right to life. Without life, all other rights are irrelevant,” concluded Staver.